Wilf equivalence relations for consecutive patterns
Abstract
Two permutations and are c-Wilf equivalent if, for each , the number of permutations in avoiding as a consecutive pattern (i.e., in adjacent positions) is the same as the number of those avoiding . In addition, and are strongly c-Wilf equivalent if, for each and , the number of permutations in containing occurrences of as a consecutive pattern is the same as for . In this paper we introduce a third, more restrictive equivalence relation, defining and to be super-strongly c-Wilf equivalent if the above condition holds for any set of prescribed positions for the occurrences. We show that, when restricted to non-overlapping permutations, these three equivalence relations coincide. We also give a necessary condition for two permutations to be strongly c-Wilf equivalent. Specifically, we show that if in are strongly c-Wilf equivalent, then . In the special case of non-overlapping permutations and , this proves a weaker version of a conjecture of the second author stating that and are c-Wilf equivalent if and only if and , up to trivial symmetries. Finally, we strengthen a recent result of Nakamura and Khoroshkin-Shapiro giving sufficient conditions for strong c-Wilf equivalence.
Cite
@article{arxiv.1801.08262,
title = {Wilf equivalence relations for consecutive patterns},
author = {Tim Dwyer and Sergi Elizalde},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.08262},
year = {2018}
}