English

Why is the $Z_c(3900)$ absent in the $h_c\pi$ final state?

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology 2026-01-08 v1

Abstract

In this work, we perform a comprehensive phenomenological analysis of the exotic hadronic states Zc(3900)Z_c(3900), Zc(4020)Z_c(4020), Zb(10610)Z_b(10610) and Zb(10650)Z_b(10650) within the framework of Heavy Quark Spin Symmetry (HQSS) and its violation. By constructing S-wave contact interactions between elastic (DDˉ/DDˉD\bar{D}^*/D^*\bar{D}^* or BBˉ/BBˉB\bar{B}^*/B^*\bar{B}^*) and inelastic (J/ψπ,hcπJ/\psi\pi, h_c\pi or Υπ\Upsilon\pi, hbπh_b\pi) channels, we solve the Lippmann-Schwinger equation to obtain physical production amplitudes and perform a global fit to experimental invariant-mass spectra. Our results demonstrate a striking difference between the charm and bottom sectors: HQSS violation is negligible in the bottom system, leading to comparable peak structures for both ZbZ_b states in all hidden-bottom decay channels. In contrast, significant HQSS breaking is required to describe the ZcZ_c system, where the violation is predominantly concentrated in the elastic interactions. This explains the observed selectivity: Zc(3900)Z_c(3900) appears prominently only in J/ψπJ/\psi\pi, while Zc(4020)Z_c(4020) appears only in hcπh_c\pi. Pole analysis confirms the molecular nature of the states, with the Zc(4020)Z_c(4020) likely arising from a threshold cusp effect. The model's robustness is verified against variations of the form factor and cutoff, showing stable results.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2601.03697,
  title  = {Why is the $Z_c(3900)$ absent in the $h_c\pi$ final state?},
  author = {Quanxing Ye and Ying Zhang and Peng-Yu Niu and Qian Wang},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.03697},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

20 pages, 11 figures