English

Why is Posterior Sampling Better than Optimism for Reinforcement Learning?

Machine Learning 2017-06-14 v3 Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning

Abstract

Computational results demonstrate that posterior sampling for reinforcement learning (PSRL) dramatically outperforms algorithms driven by optimism, such as UCRL2. We provide insight into the extent of this performance boost and the phenomenon that drives it. We leverage this insight to establish an O~(HSAT)\tilde{O}(H\sqrt{SAT}) Bayesian expected regret bound for PSRL in finite-horizon episodic Markov decision processes, where HH is the horizon, SS is the number of states, AA is the number of actions and TT is the time elapsed. This improves upon the best previous bound of O~(HSAT)\tilde{O}(H S \sqrt{AT}) for any reinforcement learning algorithm.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1607.00215,
  title  = {Why is Posterior Sampling Better than Optimism for Reinforcement Learning?},
  author = {Ian Osband and Benjamin Van Roy},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.00215},
  year   = {2017}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-22T14:40:39.426Z