English

When Valid Signals Fail: Regime Boundaries Between LLM Features and RL Trading Policies

Computation and Language 2026-04-14 v1 Artificial Intelligence Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science

Abstract

Can large language models (LLMs) generate continuous numerical features that improve reinforcement learning (RL) trading agents? We build a modular pipeline where a frozen LLM serves as a stateless feature extractor, transforming unstructured daily news and filings into a fixed-dimensional vector consumed by a downstream PPO agent. We introduce an automated prompt-optimization loop that treats the extraction prompt as a discrete hyperparameter and tunes it directly against the Information Coefficient - the Spearman rank correlation between predicted and realized returns - rather than NLP losses. The optimized prompt discovers genuinely predictive features (IC above 0.15 on held-out data). However, these valid intermediate representations do not automatically translate into downstream task performance: during a distribution shift caused by a macroeconomic shock, LLM-derived features add noise, and the augmented agent under-performs a price-only baseline. In a calmer test regime the agent recovers, yet macroeconomic state variables remain the most robust driver of policy improvement. Our findings highlight a gap between feature-level validity and policy-level robustness that parallels known challenges in transfer learning under distribution shift.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2604.10996,
  title  = {When Valid Signals Fail: Regime Boundaries Between LLM Features and RL Trading Policies},
  author = {Zhengzhe Yang},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.10996},
  year   = {2026}
}