What Makes Agile Software Development Agile?
Abstract
Together with many success stories, promises such as the increase in production speed and the improvement in stakeholders' collaboration have contributed to making agile a transformation in the software industry in which many companies want to take part. However, driven either by a natural and expected evolution or by contextual factors that challenge the adoption of agile methods as prescribed by their creator(s), software processes in practice mutate into hybrids over time. Are these still agile? In this article, we investigate the question: what makes a software development method agile? We present an empirical study grounded in a large-scale international survey that aims to identify software development methods and practices that improve or tame agility. Based on 556 data points, we analyze the perceived degree of agility in the implementation of standard project disciplines and its relation to used development methods and practices. Our findings suggest that only a small number of participants operate their projects in a purely traditional or agile manner (under 15%). That said, most project disciplines and most practices show a clear trend towards increasing degrees of agility. Compared to the methods used to develop software, the selection of practices has a stronger effect on the degree of agility of a given discipline. Finally, there are no methods or practices that explicitly guarantee or prevent agility. We conclude that agility cannot be defined solely at the process level. Additional factors need to be taken into account when trying to implement or improve agility in a software company. Finally, we discuss the field of software process-related research in the light of our findings and present a roadmap for future research.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2109.11435,
title = {What Makes Agile Software Development Agile?},
author = {Marco Kuhrmann and Paolo Tell and Regina Hebig and Jil Klünder and Jürgen Münch and Oliver Linssen and Dietmar Pfahl and Michael Felderer and Christian R. Prause and Stephen G. MacDonell and Joyce Nakatumba-Nabende and David Raffo and Sarah Beecham and Eray Tüzün and Gustavo López and Nicolas Paez and Diego Fontdevila and Sherlock A. Licorish and Steffen Küpper and Günther Ruhe and Eric Knauss and Özden Özcan-Top and Paul Clarke and Fergal McCaffery and Marcela Genero and Aurora Vizcaino and Mario Piattini and Marcos Kalinowski and Tayana Conte and Rafael Prikladnicki and Stephan Krusche and Ahmet Coşkunçay and Ezequiel Scott and Fabio Calefato and Svetlana Pimonova and Rolf-Helge Pfeiffer and Ulrik Pagh Schultz and Rogardt Heldal and Masud Fazal-Baqaie and Craig Anslow and Maleknaz Nayebi and Kurt Schneider and Stefan Sauer and Dietmar Winkler and Stefan Biffl and Maria Cecilia Bastarrica and Ita Richardson},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.11435},
year = {2021}
}
Comments
Journal paper, 17 pages, 14 figures