English

What a classical r-matrix really is

Quantum Algebra 2015-06-26 v1 Exactly Solvable and Integrable Systems

Abstract

The notion of classical rr-matrix is re-examined, and a definition suitable to differential (-difference) Lie algebras, -- where the standard definitions are shown to be deficient, -- is proposed, the notion of an O{\mathcal O}-operator. This notion has all the natural properties one would expect form it, but lacks those which are artifacts of finite-dimensional isomorpisms such as not true in differential generality relation \mboxEnd(V)VV\mbox{End}\, (V) \simeq V^* \otimes V for a vector space VV. Examples considered include a quadratic Poisson bracket on the dual space to a Lie algebra; generalized symplectic-quadratic models of such brackets (aka Clebsch representations); and Drinfel'd's 2-cocycle interpretation of nondegenate classical rr-matrices.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.math/9910188,
  title  = {What a classical r-matrix really is},
  author = {Boris A. Kupershmidt},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:math/9910188},
  year   = {2015}
}