Weaving Pathways for Justice with GPT: LLM-driven automated drafting of interactive legal applications
Artificial Intelligence2023-12-15v1Computer Vision and Pattern RecognitionComputers and SocietyHuman-Computer InteractionSocial and Information Networks
Can generative AI help us speed up the authoring of tools to help self-represented litigants? In this paper, we describe 3 approaches to automating the completion of court forms: a generative AI approach that uses GPT-3 to iteratively prompt the user to answer questions, a constrained template-driven approach that uses GPT-4-turbo to generate a draft of questions that are subject to human review, and a hybrid method. We use the open source Docassemble platform in all 3 experiments, together with a tool created at Suffolk University Law School called the Assembly Line Weaver. We conclude that the hybrid model of constrained automated drafting with human review is best suited to the task of authoring guided interviews.
@article{arxiv.2312.09198,
title = {Weaving Pathways for Justice with GPT: LLM-driven automated drafting of interactive legal applications},
author = {Quinten Steenhuis and David Colarusso and Bryce Willey},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.09198},
year = {2023}
}