There has been growing interest from both practitioners and researchers in engaging end users in AI auditing, to draw upon users' unique knowledge and lived experiences. However, we know little about how to effectively scaffold end users in auditing in ways that can generate actionable insights for AI practitioners. Through formative studies with both users and AI practitioners, we first identified a set of design goals to support user-engaged AI auditing. We then developed WeAudit, a workflow and system that supports end users in auditing AI both individually and collectively. We evaluated WeAudit through a three-week user study with user auditors and interviews with industry Generative AI practitioners. Our findings offer insights into how WeAudit supports users in noticing and reflecting upon potential AI harms and in articulating their findings in ways that industry practitioners can act upon. Based on our observations and feedback from both users and practitioners, we identify several opportunities to better support user engagement in AI auditing processes. We discuss implications for future research to support effective and responsible user engagement in AI auditing and red-teaming.
@article{arxiv.2501.01397,
title = {WeAudit: Scaffolding User Auditors and AI Practitioners in Auditing Generative AI},
author = {Wesley Hanwen Deng and Wang Claire and Howard Ziyu Han and Jason I. Hong and Kenneth Holstein and Motahhare Eslami},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.01397},
year = {2025}
}