English

Virtual vs. Real: Trading Off Simulations and Physical Experiments in Reinforcement Learning with Bayesian Optimization

Robotics 2017-09-21 v1 Machine Learning Systems and Control

Abstract

In practice, the parameters of control policies are often tuned manually. This is time-consuming and frustrating. Reinforcement learning is a promising alternative that aims to automate this process, yet often requires too many experiments to be practical. In this paper, we propose a solution to this problem by exploiting prior knowledge from simulations, which are readily available for most robotic platforms. Specifically, we extend Entropy Search, a Bayesian optimization algorithm that maximizes information gain from each experiment, to the case of multiple information sources. The result is a principled way to automatically combine cheap, but inaccurate information from simulations with expensive and accurate physical experiments in a cost-effective manner. We apply the resulting method to a cart-pole system, which confirms that the algorithm can find good control policies with fewer experiments than standard Bayesian optimization on the physical system only.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1703.01250,
  title  = {Virtual vs. Real: Trading Off Simulations and Physical Experiments in Reinforcement Learning with Bayesian Optimization},
  author = {Alonso Marco and Felix Berkenkamp and Philipp Hennig and Angela P. Schoellig and Andreas Krause and Stefan Schaal and Sebastian Trimpe},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.01250},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

7 pages, 6 figures, to appear in IEEE 2017 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

R2 v1 2026-06-22T18:35:00.137Z