English

$\varepsilon$-isometric dimension reduction for incompressible subsets of $\ell_p$

Metric Geometry 2022-03-10 v3 Data Structures and Algorithms Functional Analysis

Abstract

Fix p[1,)p\in[1,\infty), K(0,)K\in(0,\infty) and a probability measure μ\mu. We prove that for every nNn\in\mathbb{N}, ε(0,1)\varepsilon\in(0,1) and x1,,xnLp(μ)x_1,\ldots,x_n\in L_p(\mu) with maxi{1,,n}xiLp(μ)K\big\| \max_{i\in\{1,\ldots,n\}} |x_i| \big\|_{L_p(\mu)} \leq K, there exists d32e2(2K)2plognε2d\leq \frac{32e^2 (2K)^{2p}\log n}{\varepsilon^2} and vectors y1,,ynpdy_1,\ldots, y_n \in \ell_p^d such that  i,j{1,,n},xixjLp(μ)pεyiyjpdpxixjLp(μ)p+ε.\forall \ i,j\in\{1,\ldots,n\}, \qquad \|x_i-x_j\|^p_{L_p(\mu)}- \varepsilon \leq \|y_i-y_j\|_{\ell_p^d}^p \leq \|x_i-x_j\|^p_{L_p(\mu)}+\varepsilon. Moreover, the argument implies the existence of a greedy algorithm which outputs {yi}i=1n\{y_i\}_{i=1}^n after receiving {xi}i=1n\{x_i\}_{i=1}^n as input. The proof relies on a derandomized version of Maurey's empirical method (1981) combined with a combinatorial idea of Ball (1990) and classical factorization theory of Lp(μ)L_p(\mu) spaces. Motivated by the above embedding, we introduce the notion of ε\varepsilon-isometric dimension reduction of the unit ball BE{\bf B}_E of a normed space (E,E)(E,\|\cdot\|_E) and we prove that Bp{\bf B}_{\ell_p} does not admit ε\varepsilon-isometric dimension reduction by linear operators for any value of p2p\neq2.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2109.06602,
  title  = {$\varepsilon$-isometric dimension reduction for incompressible subsets of $\ell_p$},
  author = {Alexandros Eskenazis},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.06602},
  year   = {2022}
}