English

USmorph: An Updated Framework of Automatic Classification of Galaxy Morphologies and Its Application to Galaxies in the COSMOS Field

Astrophysics of Galaxies 2024-04-25 v1

Abstract

Morphological classification conveys abundant information on the formation, evolution, and environment of galaxies. In this work, we refine the two-step galaxy morphological classification framework ({\tt\string USmorph}), which employs a combination of unsupervised machine learning (UML) and supervised machine learning (SML) techniques, along with a self-consistent and robust data preprocessing step. The updated method is applied to the galaxies with Imag<25I_{\rm mag}<25 at 0.2<z<1.20.2<z<1.2 in the COSMOS field. Based on their HST/ACS I-band images, we classify them into five distinct morphological types: spherical (SPH, 15,200), early-type disk (ETD, 17,369), late-type disk (LTD, 21,143), irregular disk (IRR, 28,965), and unclassified (UNC, 17,129). In addition, we have conducted both parametric and nonparametric morphological measurements. For galaxies with stellar masses exceeding 109M\sun10^{9}M_{\sun}, a gradual increase in effective radius from SPHs to IRRs is observed, accompanied by a decrease in the S\'{e}rsic index. Nonparametric morphologies reveal distinct distributions of galaxies across the GiniM20Gini-M_{20} and CAC-A parameter spaces for different categories. Moreover, different categories exhibit significant dissimilarity in their G2G_2 and Ψ\Psi distributions. We find morphology to be strongly correlated with redshift and stellar mass. The consistency of these classification results with expected correlations among multiple parameters underscores the validity and reliability of our classification method, rendering it a valuable tool for future studies.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2404.15701,
  title  = {USmorph: An Updated Framework of Automatic Classification of Galaxy Morphologies and Its Application to Galaxies in the COSMOS Field},
  author = {Jie Song and GuanWen Fang and Shuo Ba and Zesen Lin and Yizhou Gu and Chichun Zhou and Tao Wang and Cai-Na Hao and Guilin Liu and Hongxin Zhang and Yao Yao and Xu Kong},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.15701},
  year   = {2024}
}

Comments

Accepted by ApJS, 16 pages, 12 figures