English

Using the Baire Category Theorem to Explore Lions Problem for Quasi-Banach Spaces

Functional Analysis 2024-10-29 v2 Classical Analysis and ODEs

Abstract

Many results for Banach spaces also hold for quasi-Banach spaces. One important such example is results depending on the Baire Category Theorem (BCT). We use the BCT to explore Lions problem for a quasi-Banach couple (A0,A1)(A_0, A_1). Lions problem, posed in 1960's, is to prove that different parameters (θ,p)(\theta,p) produce different interpolation spaces (A0,A1)θ,p(A_0, A_1)_{\theta, p}. We first establish conditions on A0A_0 and A1A_1 so that interpolation spaces of this couple are strictly intermediate spaces between A0+A1A_0+A_1 and A0A1A_0\cap A_1. This result, together with a reiteration theorem, gives a partial solution to Lions problem for quasi-Banach couples. We then apply our interpolation result to (partially) answer a question posed by Pietsch. More precisely, we show that if ppp\neq p^* the operator ideals Lp,q(a)(X,Y)\mathcal{L}^{(a)}_{p,q}(X,Y), Lp,q(a)(X,Y)\mathcal{L}^{(a)}_{p^*,q^*}(X,Y) generated by approximation numbers are distinct. Moreover, for any fixed pp, either all operator ideals Lp,q(a)(X,Y)\mathcal{L}^{(a)}_{p,q}(X,Y) collapse into a unique space or they are pairwise distinct. We cite counterexamples which show that using interpolation spaces is not appropriate to solve Pietsch's problem for operator ideals based on general ss-numbers. However, the BCT can be used to prove a lethargy result for arbitrary ss-numbers which guarantees that, under very minimal conditions on X,YX,Y, the space Lp,q(s)(X,Y)\mathcal{L}^{(s)}_{p,q}(X,Y) is strictly embedded into LA(X,Y)\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{A}}(X,Y). The paper is dedicated to the memory of Prof. A. Pietsch, who passed away recently.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2408.14893,
  title  = {Using the Baire Category Theorem to Explore Lions Problem for Quasi-Banach Spaces},
  author = {A. G. Aksoy and J. M. Almira},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.14893},
  year   = {2024}
}

Comments

In the previous version there was an error in a proof and now the corresponding result has been substituted by two other theorems that hopefully are right. We express our thanks to the referee who pointed the error. Also, one reference has been added