English

Use and usability: concepts of representation in philosophy, neuroscience, cognitive science, and computer science

Other Computer Science 2026-04-22 v1

Abstract

Representations play a central role in the study of both biological and artificial intelligence, as well as philosophy of mind. Across neuroscience, computer science, and philosophy, a recurring theme is that representations not only carry information but should be ``useful'' for or ``usable'' by an agent in some sense. Here, we review how the ``usefulness'' of representations has been conceptualized and how it figures into different conceptions of representation. We identify and explore four aspects of use and usability: representations generally carry \textit{information}; that information may or may not be \textit{useful} and it may or may not be encoded in a usable \textit{format}; and the representations may or may not be \textit{used downstream}. Building on these four aspects of information and use, we then organize existing perspectives on neural representations into three levels: Representations as Information (Level 1); Representations as Usable (Level 2); and Representations as Used (Level 3). Our account is meant to give readers an appreciation for the diversity of notions of ``neural representation,'' help them navigate the vast and multi-disciplinary literature on the topic, and help them clarify the appropriate notion of representation for their own investigations.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2604.13829,
  title  = {Use and usability: concepts of representation in philosophy, neuroscience, cognitive science, and computer science},
  author = {Ben Baker and Richard D. Lange and Andrew Richmond and Nikolaus Kriegeskorte and Rosa Cao and Xaq Pitkow and Odelia Schwartz},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.13829},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

Styled for publication in NBDT