English

Upper tail bounds for cycles

Combinatorics 2019-04-03 v2

Abstract

This paper examines bounds on upper tails for cycle counts in Gn,pG_{n,p}. For a fixed graph HH define ξH=ξHn,p\xi_H= \xi_H^{n,p} to be the number of copies of HH in Gn,pG_{n,p}. It is a much studied and surprisingly difficult problem to understand the upper tail of the distribution of ξH\xi_H, for example, to estimate \begin{equation*} \mathbb{P}(\xi_H > 2 \mathbb{E}\xi_H). \end{equation*} The best known result for general HH and pp is due to Janson, Oleszkiewicz, and Ruci\'nski, who, in 2004, proved \begin{align}\label{a:JOR} \exp[-O_{H, \eta}(M_H(n,p) \ln(1/p))]&<\mathbb{P}(\xi_H > (1+\eta)\mathbb{E} \xi_H)\\&<\exp[-\Omega_{H, \eta}(M_{H}(n,p))].\nonumber \end{align} Thus they determined the upper tail up to a factor of ln(1/p)\ln(1/p) in the exponent. There has since been substantial work to improve these bounds for particular HH and pp. We close the ln(1/p)\ln(1/p) gap for cycles, up to a constant in the exponent. Here the lower bound given by JOR is the truth for ll-cycles when p>ln1/(l2)nnp> \frac{\ln^{1/(l-2)}n}{n}.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1903.07488,
  title  = {Upper tail bounds for cycles},
  author = {Abigail Raz},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.07488},
  year   = {2019}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-23T08:11:36.712Z