Chart question answering (CQA) is a crucial area of Visual Language Understanding. However, the robustness and consistency of current Visual Language Models (VLMs) in this field remain under-explored. This paper evaluates state-of-the-art VLMs on comprehensive datasets, developed specifically for this study, encompassing diverse question categories and chart formats. We investigate two key aspects: 1) the models' ability to handle varying levels of chart and question complexity, and 2) their robustness across different visual representations of the same underlying data. Our analysis reveals significant performance variations based on question and chart types, highlighting both strengths and weaknesses of current models. Additionally, we identify areas for improvement and propose future research directions to build more robust and reliable CQA systems. This study sheds light on the limitations of current models and paves the way for future advancements in the field.
@article{arxiv.2407.11229,
title = {Unraveling the Truth: Do VLMs really Understand Charts? A Deep Dive into Consistency and Robustness},
author = {Srija Mukhopadhyay and Adnan Qidwai and Aparna Garimella and Pritika Ramu and Vivek Gupta and Dan Roth},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.11229},
year = {2024}
}