English

Understanding the degeneracies in NO$\nu$A data

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology 2018-11-06 v2 High Energy Physics - Experiment

Abstract

The combined analysis of νμ\nu_\mu disappearance and νe\nu_e appearance data of NOν\nuA experiment leads to three nearly degenerate solutions. This degeneracy can be understood in terms of deviations in νe\nu_e appearance signal, caused by unknown effects, with respect to the signal expected for a reference set of oscillations parameters. We define the reference set to be vacuum oscillations in the limit of maximal θ23\theta_{23} and no CP-violation. We then calculate the deviations induced in the νe\nu_e appearance signal event rate by three unknown effects: (a) matter effects, due to normal or inverted hierarchy (b) octant effects, due to θ23\theta_{23} being in higher or lower octant and (c) CP-violation, whether δCPπ/2\delta_{CP} \sim - \pi/2 or δCPπ/2\delta_{CP} \sim \pi/2. We find that the deviation caused by each of these effects is the same for NOν\nuA. The observed number of νe\nu_e events in NOν\nuA is equivalent to the increase caused by one of the effects. Therefore, the observed number of νe\nu_e appearance events of NOν\nuA is the net result of the increase caused by two of the unknown effects and the decrease caused by the third. Thus we get the three degenerate solutions. We also find that further data by NOν\nuA can not distinguish between these degenerate solutions but addition of one year of neutrino run of DUNE can make a distinction between all three solutions. The distinction between the two NH solutions and the IH solution becomes possible because of the larger matter effect in DUNE. The distinction between the two NH solutions with different octants is a result of the synergy between the anti-neutrino data of NOν\nuA and the neutrino data of DUNE.

Cite

@article{arxiv.1805.10182,
  title  = {Understanding the degeneracies in NO$\nu$A data},
  author = {Suman Bharti and Suprabh Prakash and Ushak Rahaman and S. Uma Sankar},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.10182},
  year   = {2018}
}

Comments

Published version v2; with minor changes to v1

R2 v1 2026-06-23T02:08:28.873Z