English

Unbiased Estimate of Dark Energy Density from Type Ia Supernova Data

Astrophysics 2009-11-07 v1 High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

Abstract

Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) are currently the best probes of the dark energy in the universe. To constrain the nature of dark energy in a model-independent manner, we allow the density of dark energy, ρX(z)\rho_X(z), to be an arbitrary function of redshift. Using simulated data from a space-based supernova pencil beam survey, we find that by optimizing the number of parameters used to parametrize the dimensionless dark energy density, f(z)=ρX(z)/ρX(z=0)f(z)=\rho_X(z)/\rho_X(z=0), we can obtain an unbiased estimate of both f(z) and Ωm\Omega_m (assuming a flat universe and that the weak energy condition is satisfied). A plausible supernova pencil beam survey (with a square degree field of view and for an observational duration of one year) can yield about 2000 SNe Ia with 0z20\le z \le 2. Such a survey in space would yield SN peak luminosities with a combined intrinsic and observational dispersion of σ(mint)=0.16\sigma (m_{int})=0.16 mag. We find that for such an idealized survey, Ωm\Omega_m can be measured to 10% accuracy, and f(z) can be estimated to \sim 20% to z1.5z \sim 1.5, and \sim 20-40% to z2z \sim 2, depending on the time dependence of the true dark energy density. Dark energy densities which vary more slowly can be more accurately measured. For the anticipated SNAP mission, Ωm\Omega_m can be measured to 14% accuracy, and f(z) can be estimated to \sim 20% to z1.2z \sim 1.2. Our results suggest that SNAP may gain much sensitivity to the time-dependence of f(z) and Ωm\Omega_m by devoting more observational time to the central pencil beam fields to obtain more SNe Ia at z>1.2. We also find that Monte Carlo analysis gives a more accurate estimate of the dark energy density than the maximum likelihood analysis. (abridged)

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.astro-ph/0109233,
  title  = {Unbiased Estimate of Dark Energy Density from Type Ia Supernova Data},
  author = {Yun Wang and Geoffrey Lovelace},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:astro-ph/0109233},
  year   = {2009}
}

Comments

4 ApJ pages, including 9 figures. Submitted to ApJ Letters