English

Ultrametric spaces and clouds

Metric Geometry 2025-02-03 v1

Abstract

In ``Characterization, stability and convergence of hierarchical clustering methods'' by G. E. Carlsson, F. Memoli, the natural way to construct an ultrametric space from a given metric space was presented. It was shown that the corresponding map U\textbf{U} is 11-Lipschitz for every pair of bounded metric spaces, with respect to the Gromov-Hausdorff distance. We make a simple observation that U\textbf{U} is 11-Lipschitz for pairs of all, not necessarily bounded, metric spaces. We then study the properties of the mapping U\textbf{U}. We show that, for a given dotted connected metric space AA, the mapping Ψ ⁣:XX×A\Psi\colon X\mapsto X\times A from the proper class of all bounded ultrametric spaces (X×AX\times A is endowed with the Manhattan metric) preserves the Gromov-Hausdorff distance. Moreover, the mapping U\textbf{U} is inverse to Ψ\Psi. By a dotted connected metric space, we mean a metric space in which for an arbitrary ε>0\varepsilon > 0 and every two points p,qp,\,q, there exist points x0=p,x1,,xn=qx_0 = p,\,x_1,\,\ldots,\,x_n = q such that max0jn1xjxj+1ε\max_{0\le j \le n-1}|x_jx_{j+1}|\le \varepsilon. At the end of the paper, we prove that each class (proper or not) consisting of unbounded metric spaces on finite Gromov-Hausdorff distances from each other cannot contain an ultrametric space and a dotted connected space simultaneously.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2501.19346,
  title  = {Ultrametric spaces and clouds},
  author = {I. N. Mikhailov},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.19346},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

10 pages

R2 v1 2026-06-28T21:28:07.828Z