English

Two-way quantum computers adding CPT analog of state preparation

General Physics 2023-08-30 v2

Abstract

Standard one-way quantum computers (1WQC) combine time symmetric unitary evolution, with asymmetric treatment of boundaries: state preparation allows to enforce a chosen initial state, however, for the final state measurement chooses a random value instead. As e.g. pull/push, negative/positive pressure, stimulated emission/absorption causing deexcitation/excitation are CPT analogs, and one can be used for state preparation, the second should allow for its CPT analog, referred here as CPT(state preparation) - allowing for additional chosen enforcement of the final state, its more active treatment than measurement. It should act similarly to postselection, but through applied physical constraints (instead of running multiple times). Like pumped to 1|1\rangle prepared state vs its "unpumped" 0\langle 0| CPT analog, hopefully allowing to construct two-way quantum computers (2WQC) e.g. hydrodynamical, and hopefully photonic: seen as ΦfinalUquantum gatesΦinitial\langle \Phi_{\textrm{final}}|U_{\textrm{quantum gates}}|\Phi_{\textrm{initial}}\rangle like for scattering matrix, with influenced both initial and final states. If possible, for example for an instance of 3-SAT problem on nn variables, we could prepare ensemble of 2n2^n inputs with Hadamard gates, calculate 3-SAT alternatives for them, and use CPT(state preparation) to enforce outcomes of all these alternatives to '1'. This way hopefully restricting this ensemble to satisfying given 3-SAT problem: a:SAT(a)a\sum_{a:\textrm{SAT}(a)} |a\rangle, in theory allowing to attack NP problems by simultaneously pushing and pulling information through the system for better control.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2308.13522,
  title  = {Two-way quantum computers adding CPT analog of state preparation},
  author = {Jarek Duda},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.13522},
  year   = {2023}
}

Comments

5 pages, 3 figures

R2 v1 2026-06-28T12:04:32.818Z