English

Two Remarks on Marcinkiewicz decompositions by Holomorphic Martingales

Functional Analysis 2016-09-06 v1

Abstract

The real part of H(\bT)H^\infty(\bT) is not dense in L\tR(\bT)L^\infty_{\tR}(\bT). The John-Nirenberg theorem in combination with the Helson-Szeg\"o theorem and the Hunt Muckenhaupt Wheeden theorem has been used to determine whether fL\tR(\bT)f\in L^\infty_{\tR}(\bT) can be approximated by H(\bT)\Re H^\infty(\bT) or not: \dist(f,H)=0\dist(f,\Re H^\infty)=0 if and only if for every \e>0\e>0 there exists \l0>0\l_0>0 so that for \l>\l0\l>\l_0 and any interval I\sbe\bTI\sbe \bT. {xI:f~(f~)I>\l}Ie\l/\e,|\{x\in I:|\tilde f-(\tilde f)_I|>\l\}|\le |I|e^{-\l/ \e}, where f~\tilde f denotes the Hilbert transform of ff. See [G] p. 259. This result is contrasted by the following \begin{theor} Let fL\tRf\in L^\infty_{\tR} and \e>0\e>0. Then there is a function gH(\bT)g\in H^\infty(\bT) and a set E\sb\bTE\sb \bT so that \bT\smE<\e|\bT\sm E|<\e and f=g\mboxonE.f=\Re g\quad\mbox{ on } E. \end{theor} This theorem is best regarded as a corollary to Men'shov's correction theorem. For the classical proof of Men'shov's theorem see [Ba, Ch VI \S 1-\S4]. Simple proofs of Men'shov's theorem -- together with significant extensions -- have been obtained by S.V. Khruschev in [Kh] and S.V. Kislyakov in [K1], [K2] and [K3]. In [S] C. Sundberg used \paˉ\bar\pa-techniques (in particular [G, Theorem VIII.1. gave a proof of Theorem 1 that does not mention Men'shov's theorem. The purpose of this paper is to use a Marcinkiewicz decomposition on Holomorphic Martingales to give another proof of Theorem 1. In this way we avoid uniformly convergent Fourier series as well as \paˉ\bar\pa-techniques.

Cite

@article{arxiv.math/9210209,
  title  = {Two Remarks on Marcinkiewicz decompositions by Holomorphic Martingales},
  author = {Paul F. X. Müller},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:math/9210209},
  year   = {2016}
}
R2 v1 2026-07-22T17:54:03.792Z