English

Two Player Hidden Pointer Chasing and Multi-Pass Lower Bounds in Turnstile Streams

Computational Complexity 2020-04-22 v2 Data Structures and Algorithms Information Theory math.IT

Abstract

The authors have withdrawn this paper due to an error in the proof of Lemma 3.4. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The authors have withdrawn this paper due to an error in the proof of Lemma 3.4z(Assadi, Chen, and Khanna, 2019) define a 4-player hidden-pointer-chasing (HPC4\mathsf{HPC}^4), and using it, give strong multi-pass lower bounds for graph problems in the streaming model of computation and a lower bound on the query complexity of sub-modular minimization. We present a two-player version (HPC2\mathsf{HPC}^2) of HPC4\mathsf{HPC}^4 that has matching communication complexity to HPC4\mathsf{HPC}^4. Our formulation allows us to lower bound its communication complexity with a simple direct-sum argument. Using this lower bound on the communication complexity of HPC2\mathsf{HPC}^2, we retain the streaming and query complexity lower bounds by (Assadi, Chen, and Khanna, 2019). Further, by giving reductions from HPC2\mathsf{HPC}^2, we prove new multi-pass space lower bounds for graph problems in turnstile streams. In particular, we show that any algorithm which computes the exact weight of the maximum weighted matching in an nn-vertex graph requires O~(n2)\tilde{O}(n^{2}) space unless it makes ω(logn)\omega(\log n) passes over the turnstile stream, and that any algorithm which computes the minimum s-ts\text{-}t distance in an nn-vertex graph requires n2o(1)n^{2-o(1)} space unless it makes nΩ(1)n^{\Omega(1)} passes over the turnstile stream. Our reductions can be modified to use HPC4\mathsf{HPC}^4 as well.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2002.12856,
  title  = {Two Player Hidden Pointer Chasing and Multi-Pass Lower Bounds in Turnstile Streams},
  author = {Anay Mehrotra and Vibhor Porwal and Raghunath Tewari},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.12856},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

The authors have withdrawn this paper due to an error in the proof of Lemma 3.4

R2 v1 2026-06-23T13:57:58.164Z