English

Tverberg's theorem for unions of convex sets: Sharp bounds and colored extensions

Combinatorics 2026-07-14 v1 Metric Geometry

Abstract

Let fr(d,s1,,sr)f_{r}(d,s_{1},\ldots,s_{r}) be the least NN such that every NN-point set PRdP\subseteq \mathbb{R}^{d} has an rr-partition P=P1PrP=P_{1}\sqcup\cdots\sqcup P_{r} with the following property: whenever CiPiC_{i}\supseteq P_{i} is a union of at most sis_{i} convex sets, one has i=1rCi\bigcap_{i=1}^{r}C_{i}\ne\emptyset. A recent breakthrough of Alon and Smorodinsky established the first effective upper bounds fr(d,s,,s)Cdr2srlogrlog(esr)f_{r}(d,s,\ldots,s)\le Cdr^{2}s^{r}\log r\log(es^{r}) for this problem. We obtain an asymptotically sharp lower bound by proving fr(d,s,,s)c(dr+2)srlog(s+1)f_r(d,s,\ldots,s)\ge c(d-r+2)s^r\log(s+1) for every dr+2d\ge r+2, which shows that fr(d,s,,s)=Θd,r(srlogs)f_r(d,s,\ldots,s)=\Theta_{d,r}(s^r\log s) for every fixed dr+2d\ge r+2. We also prove the general lower bound fr(d,s,,s)>smin{d,r}f_r(d,s,\ldots,s)>s^{\min\{d,r\}}. On the other hand, we develop a local counting argument to show that fr(d,s,,s)Cdrsrlog(ersr)f_r(d,s,\ldots,s)\le C_{d}rs^r\log(ers^r) and fr(d,s,,s)Cdrd+2sd+1log(ers)f_r(d,s,\ldots,s)\le C_{d}r^{d+2}s^{d+1}\log(ers) whenever rd+1r\ge d+1, improving the upper bound of Alon and Smorodinsky. We also study two colored analogues. The direct B\'{a}r\'{a}ny--Larman-type extension, in which one seeks rr disjoint rainbow sets chosen from d+1d+1 color classes, fails as soon as two convex pieces are allowed. Nevertheless, we identify the correct colored formulation and prove a complete transversal theorem with quantitative bounds, which was also independently obtained by Keller and Smorodinsky.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2607.12449,
  title  = {Tverberg's theorem for unions of convex sets: Sharp bounds and colored extensions},
  author = {Gennian Ge and Yang Shu and Zixiang Xu},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.12449},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

16 pages. Note added: Keller and Smorodinsky independently proved Theorem 1.5 in broader setting via different method. arXiv:2607.10496