Trustworthy and Responsible AI for Human-Centric Autonomous Decision-Making Systems
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has paved the way for revolutionary decision-making processes, which if harnessed appropriately, can contribute to advancements in various sectors, from healthcare to economics. However, its black box nature presents significant ethical challenges related to bias and transparency. AI applications are hugely impacted by biases, presenting inconsistent and unreliable findings, leading to significant costs and consequences, highlighting and perpetuating inequalities and unequal access to resources. Hence, developing safe, reliable, ethical, and Trustworthy AI systems is essential. Our team of researchers working with Trustworthy and Responsible AI, part of the Transdisciplinary Scholarship Initiative within the University of Calgary, conducts research on Trustworthy and Responsible AI, including fairness, bias mitigation, reproducibility, generalization, interpretability, and authenticity. In this paper, we review and discuss the intricacies of AI biases, definitions, methods of detection and mitigation, and metrics for evaluating bias. We also discuss open challenges with regard to the trustworthiness and widespread application of AI across diverse domains of human-centric decision making, as well as guidelines to foster Responsible and Trustworthy AI models.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2408.15550,
title = {Trustworthy and Responsible AI for Human-Centric Autonomous Decision-Making Systems},
author = {Farzaneh Dehghani and Mahsa Dibaji and Fahim Anzum and Lily Dey and Alican Basdemir and Sayeh Bayat and Jean-Christophe Boucher and Steve Drew and Sarah Elaine Eaton and Richard Frayne and Gouri Ginde and Ashley Harris and Yani Ioannou and Catherine Lebel and John Lysack and Leslie Salgado Arzuaga and Emma Stanley and Roberto Souza and Ronnie de Souza Santos and Lana Wells and Tyler Williamson and Matthias Wilms and Zaman Wahid and Mark Ungrin and Marina Gavrilova and Mariana Bento},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.15550},
year = {2024}
}
Comments
44 pages, 2 figures