English

Transport and Interface: an Uncertainty Principle for the Wasserstein distance

Classical Analysis and ODEs 2019-05-22 v2 Metric Geometry

Abstract

Let f:[0,1]dRf: [0,1]^d \rightarrow \mathbb{R} be a continuous function with zero mean and interpret f+=max(f,0)f_{+} = \max(f, 0) and f=min(f,0)f_{-} = -\min(f, 0) as the densities of two measures. We prove that if the cost of transport from f+f_{+} to ff_{-} is small (in terms of the Wasserstein distance W1W^1), then the nodal set {x(0,1)d:f(x)=0}\left\{x \in (0,1)^d: f(x) = 0 \right\} has to be large (`if it is always easy to buy milk, there must be many supermarkets'). More precisely, we show that W1(f+,f)Hd1{x(0,1)d:f(x)=0}d(fL1fL)41dfL1. W_1(f_+, f_-) \cdot \mathcal{H}^{d-1}\left\{x \in (0,1)^d: f(x) = 0 \right\} \gtrsim_{d} \left( \frac{\|f\|_{L^1}}{\|f\|_{L^{\infty}}} \right)^{4 - \frac1d} \|f\|_{L^1} \, . We apply this ``uncertainty principle" to the metric Sturm-Liouville theory in higher dimensions to show that a linear combination of eigenfunctions of an elliptic operator cannot have an arbitrarily small zero set.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1905.07450,
  title  = {Transport and Interface: an Uncertainty Principle for the Wasserstein distance},
  author = {Amir Sagiv and Stefan Steinerberger},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.07450},
  year   = {2019}
}