Automatically evaluating the quality of dialogue responses for unstructured domains is a challenging problem. Unfortunately, existing automatic evaluation metrics are biased and correlate very poorly with human judgements of response quality. Yet having an accurate automatic evaluation procedure is crucial for dialogue research, as it allows rapid prototyping and testing of new models with fewer expensive human evaluations. In response to this challenge, we formulate automatic dialogue evaluation as a learning problem. We present an evaluation model (ADEM) that learns to predict human-like scores to input responses, using a new dataset of human response scores. We show that the ADEM model's predictions correlate significantly, and at a level much higher than word-overlap metrics such as BLEU, with human judgements at both the utterance and system-level. We also show that ADEM can generalize to evaluating dialogue models unseen during training, an important step for automatic dialogue evaluation.
@article{arxiv.1708.07149,
title = {Towards an Automatic Turing Test: Learning to Evaluate Dialogue Responses},
author = {Ryan Lowe and Michael Noseworthy and Iulian V. Serban and Nicolas Angelard-Gontier and Yoshua Bengio and Joelle Pineau},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.07149},
year = {2018}
}