English

Tournaments, Johnson Graphs, and NC-Teaching

Combinatorics 2022-05-06 v1 Discrete Mathematics

Abstract

Quite recently a teaching model, called "No-Clash Teaching" or simply "NC-Teaching", had been suggested that is provably optimal in the following strong sense. First, it satisfies Goldman and Matthias' collusion-freeness condition. Second, the NC-teaching dimension (= NCTD) is smaller than or equal to the teaching dimension with respect to any other collusion-free teaching model. It has also been shown that any concept class which has NC-teaching dimension dd and is defined over a domain of size nn can have at most 2d(nd)2^d \binom{n}{d} concepts. The main results in this paper are as follows. First, we characterize the maximum concept classes of NC-teaching dimension 11 as classes which are induced by tournaments (= complete oriented graphs) in a very natural way. Second, we show that there exists a family (\cCn)n1(\cC_n)_{n\ge1} of concept classes such that the well known recursive teaching dimension (= RTD) of \cCn\cC_n grows logarithmically in n=\cCnn = |\cC_n| while, for every n1n\ge1, the NC-teaching dimension of \cCn\cC_n equals 11. Since the recursive teaching dimension of a finite concept class \cC\cC is generally bounded log\cC\log|\cC|, the family (\cCn)n1(\cC_n)_{n\ge1} separates RTD from NCTD in the most striking way. The proof of existence of the family (\cCn)n1(\cC_n)_{n\ge1} makes use of the probabilistic method and random tournaments. Third, we improve the afore-mentioned upper bound 2d(nd)2^d\binom{n}{d} by a factor of order d\sqrt{d}. The verification of the superior bound makes use of Johnson graphs and maximum subgraphs not containing large narrow cliques.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2205.02792,
  title  = {Tournaments, Johnson Graphs, and NC-Teaching},
  author = {Hans U. Simon},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.02792},
  year   = {2022}
}

Comments

12 pages, 0 figures

R2 v1 2026-06-24T11:08:31.427Z