English

Three-dimensional complex reflection groups via Ford domains

Geometric Topology 2023-06-28 v1 Differential Geometry

Abstract

We initiate the study of deformations of groups in three-dimensional complex hyperbolic geometry. Let G=ι1,ι2,ι3,ι4ι12=ι22=ι32=ι42=id,(ι1ι3)2=(ι1ι4)3=(ι2ι4)2=idG=\left\langle \iota_1, \iota_2, \iota_3, \iota_4 \Bigg| \begin{array}{c} \iota_1^2= \iota_2^2 = \iota_3^2=\iota_4^2=id,\\ (\iota_1 \iota_3)^{2}=(\iota_1 \iota_4)^{3}=(\iota_2 \iota_4)^{2}=id \end{array}\right\rangle be an abstract group. We study representations ρ:GPU(3,1)\rho: G \rightarrow \mathbf{PU}(3,1), where ρ(ιi)=Ii\rho( \iota_{i})=I_{i} is a complex reflection fixing a complex hyperbolic plane in HC3{\bf H}^{3}_{\mathbb C} for 1i41 \leq i \leq 4, with the additional condition that I1I2I_1I_2 is parabolic. When we assume two pairs of hyper-parallel complex hyperbolic planes have the same distance, then the moduli space M\mathcal{M} is parameterized by (h,t)[1,)×[0,π](h,t) \in [1, \infty) \times [0, \pi] but tarccos(3h2+14h2)t \leq \operatorname{arccos}(-\frac{3h^2+1}{4h^2}). In particular, t=0t=0 and t=arccos(3h2+14h2)t=\operatorname{arccos}(-\frac{3h^2+1}{4h^2}) degenerate to HR3{\bf H}^{3}_{\mathbb R}-geometry and HC2{\bf H}^{2}_{\mathbb C}-geometry respectively. Using the Ford domain of ρ(2,arccos(78))(G)\rho_{(\sqrt{2},\operatorname{arccos}(-\frac{7}{8}))}(G) as a guide, we show ρ(h,t)\rho_{(h,t)} is a discrete and faithful representation of GPU(3,1)G \rightarrow \mathbf{PU}(3,1) when (h,t)M(h,t) \in \mathcal{M} is near to (2,arccos(78))(\sqrt{2}, \operatorname{arccos}(-\frac{7}{8})). This is the first nontrivial example of the Ford domain of a subgroup in PU(3,1)\mathbf{PU}(3,1) that has been studied.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2306.15240,
  title  = {Three-dimensional complex reflection groups via Ford domains},
  author = {Jiming Ma},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.15240},
  year   = {2023}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-28T11:15:22.591Z