English

Thermonuclear 17O(n,gamma)18O reaction rate and its astrophysical implications

Nuclear Theory 2022-03-14 v1 Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

Abstract

A new thermonuclear 17^{17}O(nn,γ\gamma)18^{18}O rate is derived based on a complete calculation of the direct-capture (DC) and resonant-capture contributions, for a temperature region up to 2 GK of astrophysical interest. We have firstly calculated the DC and subthreshold contributions in the energy region up to 1 MeV, and estimated the associated uncertainties by a Monte-Carlo approach. It shows that the present rate is remarkably larger than that adopted in the JINA REACLIB in the temperature region of 0.01 \sim 2 GK, by up to a factor of \sim80. The astrophysical impacts of our rate have been examined in both ss-process and rr-process models. In our main ss-process model which simulates flash-driven convective mixing in metal deficient asymptotic giant branch stars, both 18^{18}O and 19^{19}F abundances in interpulse phases are enhanced dramatically by factors of 20\sim 20--4040 due to the new larger 17^{17}O(nn,γ\gamma)18^{18}O rate. It shows, however, that this reaction hardly affects the weak ss-process in massive stars since the 17^{17}O abundance never becomes significantly large in the massive stars. For the rr-process nucleosynthesis, we have studied impacts of our rate in both the collapsar and neutron burst models, and found that the effect can be neglected, although an interesting "loophole" effect is found owing to the enhanced new rate, which significantly changes the final nuclear abundances if fission recycling is not involved in the model, however, these significant differences are almost completely washed out if the fission recycling is considered.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2110.02447,
  title  = {Thermonuclear 17O(n,gamma)18O reaction rate and its astrophysical implications},
  author = {Li-Yong Zhang and Jian-Jun He and Motohiko Kusakabe and Zhen-Yu He and Toshitaka Kajino},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.02447},
  year   = {2022}
}

Comments

27 pages, 28 figures