There is no largest proper operator ideal
Abstract
An operator ideal is proper if the only operators of the form it contains have finite rank. We answer a question posed by Pietsch (1979) by proving that there is no largest proper operator ideal. Our proof is based on an extension of the construction by Aiena-Gonz\'alez (2000), of an improjective but essential operator on Gowers-Maurey's shift space (1997), through a new analysis of the algebra of operators on powers of . We also prove that certain properties hold for general -linear operators if and only if they hold for these operators seen as real: for example this holds for the ideals of strictly singular, strictly cosingular, or inessential operators, answering a question of Gonz\'alez-Herrera (2007). This gives us a frame to extend the negative answer to the question of Pietsch to the real setting.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2005.07672,
title = {There is no largest proper operator ideal},
author = {Valentin Ferenczi},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.07672},
year = {2021}
}
Comments
25 pages