The US 2000-2003 Market Descent: Clarifications
Abstract
In a recent comment (Johansen A 2003 An alternative view, Quant. Finance 3: C6-C7, cond-mat/0302141), Anders Johansen has criticized our methodology and has questioned several of our results published in [Sornette D and Zhou W-X 2002 The US 2000-2002 market descent: how much longer and deeper? Quant. Finance 2: 468-81, cond-mat/0209065] and in our two consequent preprints [cond-mat/0212010, physics/0301023]. In the present reply, we clarify the issues on (i) the analogy between rupture and crash, (ii) the Landau expansion, ``double cosine'' and Weierstrass-type solutions, (iii) the symmetry between bubbles and anti-bubbles and universality, (iv) the condition of criticality, (v) the meaning of ``bullish anti-bubbles'', (vi) the absolute value of t_c-t, (vii) the fractal log-periodic power law patterns, (viii) the similarity between the Nikkei index in 1990-2000 and the S&P500 in 2000-2002 and (ix) the present status of our prediction.
Cite
@article{arxiv.cond-mat/0305004,
title = {The US 2000-2003 Market Descent: Clarifications},
author = {D. Sornette and W. -X. Zhou},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:cond-mat/0305004},
year = {2008}
}
Comments
6 Latex pages, a shorter version will appear soon in Quantitative Finance