English

The tangle-valued 1-cocycle for knots

Geometric Topology 2025-09-30 v4

Abstract

This paper contains the strongest and at the same time most calculable knot invariant ever. Let Θ\Theta be the topological moduli space of all ordered oriented tangles in 3-space. We construct a non-trivial combinatorial 1-cocycle L\mathbb{L} for Θ\Theta that takes its values in H0(Θ;Z)H_0(\Theta;\mathbb{Z}). The 1-cocycle L\mathbb{L} has a very nice property, called the {\em scan-property}: if we slide a tangle TT over or under a given crossing cc of a fixed tangle TT', then the value of L\mathbb{L} on this arc scan(T)scan(T) in Θ\Theta is already an isotopy invariant of TT. In particular, let DD be a framed long knot diagram. We take the product with a fixed long knot diagram KK and we consider the 2-cable, with a fixed crossing cc in 2K2K. L(scan(2D))\mathbb{L}(scan(2D)) gives an element in H0(Θ)H_0(\Theta). To this element we associate the {\em set of Alexander vectors}, consisting of the corresponding integer multiples of the one-variable Alexander polynomials of (the standard closures) of all sub-tangles of each of the tangles. We can vary the knots (K,c)(K,c) and moreover we can iterate our construction by starting now again the scanscan with the tangles in L(scan(2D))\mathbb{L}(scan(2D)) and so on. The result is the infinite {\em Alexander tree}, which is an isotopy invariant of the knot represented by DD. {\em As examples we show with just one edge of the Alexander tree that the knot 8178_{17} and the Conway knot are not invertible!} This makes the Alexander tree a very promising candidate for a complete and "locally" calculable knot invariant, because the tangles in L(scan(2D))\mathbb{L}(scan(2D)) can be drawn with linear complexity and their Alexander polynomials can be calculated with quartic complexity with respect to the number of crossings of DD.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2506.17738,
  title  = {The tangle-valued 1-cocycle for knots},
  author = {Thomas Fiedler},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.17738},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

Hugh Morton has found an error in the applications and the present 1-cocycle turns out to be not interesting

R2 v1 2026-07-01T03:27:53.759Z