English

The role of diffusivity quenching in flux-transport dynamo models

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics 2009-08-05 v1

Abstract

In the non-linear phase of a dynamo process, the back-reaction of the magnetic field upon the turbulent motion results in a decrease of the turbulence level and therefore in a suppression of both the magnetic field amplification (the alpha-quenching effect) and the turbulent magnetic diffusivity (the eta-quenching effect). While the former has been widely explored, the effects of eta-quenching in the magnetic field evolution have rarely been considered. In this work we investigate the role of the suppression of diffusivity in a flux-transport solar dynamo model that also includes a non-linear alpha-quenching term. Our results indicate that, although for alpha-quenching the dependence of the magnetic field amplification with the quenching factor is nearly linear, the magnetic field response to eta-quenching is non-linear and spatially non-uniform. We have found that the magnetic field can be locally amplified in this case, forming long-lived structures whose maximum amplitude can be up to ~2.5 times larger at the tachocline and up to ~2 times larger at the center of the convection zone than in models without quenching. However, this amplification leads to unobservable effects and to a worse distribution of the magnetic field in the butterfly diagram. Since the dynamo cycle period increases when the efficiency of the quenching increases, we have also explored whether the eta-quenching can cause a diffusion-dominated model to drift into an advection-dominated regime. We have found that models undergoing a large suppression of the diffusivity produce a strong segregation of magnetic fields that may lead to unsteady dynamo-oscillations. On the other hand, an initially diffusion-dominated model undergoing a small suppression in eta remains in the diffusion-dominated regime.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.0906.3685,
  title  = {The role of diffusivity quenching in flux-transport dynamo models},
  author = {G. A. Guerrero and M. Dikpati and E. M. de Gouveia Dal Pino},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:0906.3685},
  year   = {2009}
}

Comments

36 pages, 12 figures, accepted for publication in ApJ