English

The Problem of Atypicality in LLM-Powered Psychiatry

Computers and Society 2025-08-11 v1

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly proposed as scalable solutions to the global mental health crisis. But their deployment in psychiatric contexts raises a distinctive ethical concern: the problem of atypicality. Because LLMs generate outputs based on population-level statistical regularities, their responses -- while typically appropriate for general users -- may be dangerously inappropriate when interpreted by psychiatric patients, who often exhibit atypical cognitive or interpretive patterns. We argue that standard mitigation strategies, such as prompt engineering or fine-tuning, are insufficient to resolve this structural risk. Instead, we propose dynamic contextual certification (DCC): a staged, reversible and context-sensitive framework for deploying LLMs in psychiatry, inspired by clinical translation and dynamic safety models from artificial intelligence governance. DCC reframes chatbot deployment as an ongoing epistemic and ethical process that prioritises interpretive safety over static performance benchmarks. Atypicality, we argue, cannot be eliminated -- but it can, and must, be proactively managed.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2508.06479,
  title  = {The Problem of Atypicality in LLM-Powered Psychiatry},
  author = {Bosco Garcia and Eugene Y. S. Chua and Harman Singh Brah},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.06479},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

Preprint of 8/8/2025 -- please cite published version. This article has been published in the Journal of Medical Ethics (2025) following peer review and can also be viewed on the journal's website at 10.1136/jme-2025-110972