English

The Physics of Protoneutron Star Winds: Implications for r-Process Nucleosynthesis

Astrophysics 2011-05-05 v2

Abstract

We solve the general-relativistic steady-state eigenvalue problem of neutrino-driven protoneutron star winds, which immediately follow core-collapse supernova explosions. We provide velocity, density, temperature, and composition profiles and explore the systematics and structures generic to such a wind for a variety of protoneutron star characteristics. Furthermore, we derive the entropy, dynamical timescale, and neutron-to-seed ratio in the general relativistic framework essential in assessing this site as a candidate for rr-process nucleosynthesis. Generally, we find that for a given mass outflow rate (M˙\dot{M}), the dynamical timescale of the wind is significantly shorter than previously thought. We argue against the existence or viability of a high entropy (300\gtrsim300 per kB_{B} per baryon), long dynamical timescale rr-process epoch. In support of this conclusion, we model the protoneutron star cooling phase, calculate nucleosynthetic yields in our steady-state profiles, and estimate the integrated mass loss. We find that transonic winds enter a high entropy phase only with very low M˙\dot{M} (1×109\lesssim1\times10^{-9} M_\odot s1^{-1}) and extremely long dynamical timescale (τρ0.5\tau_\rho\gtrsim0.5 seconds). Our results support the possible existence of an early rr-process epoch at modest entropy (150\sim150) and very short dynamical timescale, consistent in our calculations with a very massive or very compact protoneutron star that contracts rapidly after the preceding supernova. We explore possible modifications to our models, which might yield significant rr-process nucleosynthesis generically. Finally, we speculate on the effect of fallback and shocks on both the wind physics and nucleosynthesis.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.astro-ph/0105004,
  title  = {The Physics of Protoneutron Star Winds: Implications for r-Process Nucleosynthesis},
  author = {Todd A. Thompson and Adam Burrows and Bradley S. Meyer},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:astro-ph/0105004},
  year   = {2011}
}

Comments

32 pages, aastex, 13 figures, accepted to the Astrophysical Journal; paper revised and various points clarified

R2 v1 2026-07-22T07:57:57.268Z