English

The Pan-STARRS1 $\mathbf{z>5.6}$ Quasar Survey: III. The $\mathbf{z\approx6}$ Quasar Luminosity Function

Astrophysics of Galaxies 2023-02-10 v2

Abstract

We present the z ⁣ ⁣6z\!\approx\!6 type-1 quasar luminosity function (QLF) based on the Pan-STARRS1 (PS1) quasar survey. The PS1 sample includes 125 quasars at z5.76.2z\approx5.7-6.2 with 28M145025-28\lesssim M_{1450}\lesssim-25. Complemented by 48 fainter quasars from the SHELLQs survey, we evaluate the z6z\approx6 QLF over 28M145022-28\lesssim M_{1450}\lesssim-22. Adopting a double power law with an exponential evolution of the quasar density (Φ(z)10k(z6)\Phi(z)\propto10^{k(z-6)}; k=0.7k=-0.7), we use a maximum likelihood method to model our data. We find a break magnitude of M=26.380.60+0.79magM^*=-26.38_{-0.60}^{+0.79}\,\text{mag}, a faint end slope of α=1.700.19+0.29\alpha=-1.70_{-0.19}^{+0.29}, and a steep bright end slope with β=3.841.21+0.63\beta=-3.84_{-1.21}^{+0.63}. Based on our new QLF model we determine the quasar comoving spatial density at z ⁣ ⁣6z\!\approx\!6 to be n(M1450<26)=1.160.12+0.13cGpc3n( M_{1450}<-26)=1.16_{-0.12}^{+0.13}\,\text{cGpc}^{-3}. In comparison with the literature, we find the quasar density to evolve with a constant value of k0.7k\approx-0.7 from z7z\approx7 to z4z\approx4. Additionally, we derive an ionizing emissivity of ϵ912(z=6)=7.231.02+1.65×1022ergs1Hz1cMpc3\epsilon_{912}(z=6) =7.23_{-1.02}^{+1.65}\times 10^{22}\,\text{erg}\,\text{s}^{-1}\text{Hz}^{-1}\text{cMpc}^{-3} based on the QLF measurement. Given standard assumptions and the recent measurement of the mean free path of Becker et al. (2021) at z6z\approx6 we calculate an HI photoionizing rate of ΓHI(z=6)6×1016s1\Gamma_{\text{HI}}(z{=}6) \approx 6 \times10^{-16}\,\text{s}^{-1}, strongly disfavoring a dominant role of quasars in hydrogen reionization.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2212.04179,
  title  = {The Pan-STARRS1 $\mathbf{z>5.6}$ Quasar Survey: III. The $\mathbf{z\approx6}$ Quasar Luminosity Function},
  author = {Jan-Torge Schindler and Eduardo Bañados and Thomas Connor and Roberto Decarli and Xiaohui Fan and Emanuele Paolo Farina and Chiara Mazzucchelli and Riccardo Nanni and Hans-Walter Rix and Daniel Stern and Bram P. Venemans and Fabian Walter},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.04179},
  year   = {2023}
}

Comments

accepted by the Astrophysical Journal; see companion paper by Ba\~nados et al. (arXiv:2212.04452)