English

The nature of "dark" gamma-ray bursts

High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena 2016-08-14 v1

Abstract

Context: Thirteen years after the discovery of the first afterglows, the nature of dark gamma-ray bursts (GRB) still eludes explanation: while each ng-duration GRB typically has an X-ray afterglow, optical/NIR emission is only seen for 40-60% of them. Aim: Here we use the afterglow detection statistics of the systematic follow-up observations performed with GROND since mid-2007 in order to derive the fraction of "dark bursts" according to different methods, and to distinguish between various scenarios for "dark bursts". Method: Observations were performed with the 7-channel "Gamma-Ray Optical and Near-infrared Detector" (GROND) at the 2.2m MPI/ESO telescope. We used the afterglow detection rate in dependence on the delay time between GRB and the first GROND exposure. Results: For long-duration Swift bursts with a detected X-ray afterglow, we achieve a 90% (35/39) detection rate of optical/NIR afterglows whenever our observations started within less than 240\,min after the burst. Complementing our GROND data with Swift/XRT spectra we construct broad-band spectral energy distributions and derive rest-frame extinctions. e detect 25-40% "dark bursts", depending on the definition used. The faint optical afterglow emission of "dark bursts" is mainly due to a combination of two contributing factors: (i) moderate intrinsic extinction at moderate redshifts, and (ii) about 22% of "dark" bursts at redshift >>5.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1011.0618,
  title  = {The nature of "dark" gamma-ray bursts},
  author = {J. Greiner and T. Krühler and S. Klose and P. Afonso and C. Clemens and R. Filgas and D. H. Hartmann and A. Küpcü Yoldaş and M. Nardini and F. Olivares Estay and A. Rau and A. Rossi and P. Schady and A. Updike},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1011.0618},
  year   = {2016}
}

Comments

9 pages, 6 figs, A&A (accepted)