The NANOGrav 12.5-year data set: Search for Non-Einsteinian Polarization Modes in theGravitational-Wave Background
Abstract
We search NANOGrav's 12.5-year data set for evidence of a gravitational wave background (GWB) with all the spatial correlations allowed by general metric theories of gravity. We find no substantial evidence in favor of the existence of such correlations in our data. We find that scalar-transverse (ST) correlations yield signal-to-noise ratios and Bayes factors that are higher than quadrupolar (tensor transverse, TT) correlations. Specifically, we find ST correlations with a signal-to-noise ratio of 2.8 that are preferred over TT correlations (Hellings and Downs correlations) with Bayesian odds of about 20:1. However, the significance of ST correlations is reduced dramatically when we include modeling of the Solar System ephemeris systematics and/or remove pulsar J00300451 entirely from consideration. Even taking the nominal signal-to-noise ratios at face value, analyses of simulated data sets show that such values are not extremely unlikely to be observed in cases where only the usual TT modes are present in the GWB. In the absence of a detection of any polarization mode of gravity, we place upper limits on their amplitudes for a spectral index of and a reference frequency of . Among the upper limits for eight general families of metric theories of gravity, we find the values of and for the family of metric spacetime theories that contain both TT and ST modes.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2109.14706,
title = {The NANOGrav 12.5-year data set: Search for Non-Einsteinian Polarization Modes in theGravitational-Wave Background},
author = {Zaven Arzoumanian and Paul T. Baker and Harsha Blumer and Bence Becsy and Adam Brazier and Paul R. Brook and Sarah Burke-Spolaor and Maria Charisi and Shami Chatterjee and Siyuan Chen and James M. Cordes and Neil J. Cornish and Fronefield Crawford and H. Thankful Cromartie and Megan E. DeCesar and Dallas M. DeGan and Paul B. Demorest and Timothy Dolch and Brendan Drachler and Justin A. Ellis and Elizabeth C. Ferrara and William Fiore and Emmanuel Fonseca and Nathan Garver-Daniels and Peter A. Gentile and Deborah C. Good and Jeffrey S. Hazboun and A. Miguel Holgado and Kristina Islo and Ross J. Jennings and Megan L. Jones and Andrew R. Kaiser and David L. Kaplan and Luke Zoltan Kelley and Joey Shapiro Key and Nima Laal and Michael T. Lam and T. Joseph W. Lazio and Duncan R. Lorimer and Tingting Liu and Jing Luo and Ryan S. Lynch and Dustin R. Madison and Alexander McEwen and Maura A. McLaughlin and Chiara M. F. Mingarelli and Cherry Ng and David J. Nice and Ken D. Olum and Timothy T. Pennucci and Nihan S. Pol and Scott M. Ransom and Paul S. Ray and Joseph D. Romano and Shashwat C. Sardesai and Brent J. Shapiro-Albert and Xavier Siemens and Joseph Simon and Magdalena S. Siwek and Renee Spiewak and Ingrid H. Stairs and Daniel R. Stinebring and Kevin Stovall and Jerry P. Sun and Joseph K. Swiggum and Stephen R. Taylor and Jacob E. Turner and Michele Vallisneri and Sarah J. Vigeland and Haley M. Wahl and Caitlin A. Witt},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.14706},
year = {2021}
}
Comments
24 pages, 18 figures, 3 appendices. Please send any comments/questions to Nima Laal ([email protected])