English

The Missing Variable: Socio-Technical Alignment in Risk Evaluation

Computers and Society 2025-12-09 v1 Human-Computer Interaction Systems and Control Systems and Control

Abstract

This paper addresses a critical gap in the risk assessment of AI-enabled safety-critical systems. While these systems, where AI systems assists human operators, function as complex socio-technical systems, existing risk evaluation methods fail to account for the associated complex interaction between human, technical, and organizational elements. Through a comparative analysis of system attributes from both socio-technical and AI-enabled systems and a review of current risk evaluation methods, we confirm the absence of socio-technical considerations in standard risk expressions. To bridge this gap, we introduce a novel socio-technical alignment STASTA variable designed to be integrated into the foundational risk equation. This variable estimates the degree of harmonious interaction between the AI systems, human operators, and organizational processes. A case study on an AI-enabled liquid hydrogen bunkering system demonstrates the variable's relevance. By comparing a naive and a safeguarded system design, we illustrate how the STASTA-augmented expression captures socio-technical safety implications that traditional risk evaluation overlooks, providing a more holistic basis for risk evaluation.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2512.06354,
  title  = {The Missing Variable: Socio-Technical Alignment in Risk Evaluation},
  author = {Niclas Flehmig and Mary Ann Lundteigen and Shen Yin},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.06354},
  year   = {2025}
}
R2 v1 2026-07-01T08:12:52.263Z