The Missing Piece in Pre-trained Model Evaluation: Reward-Guided Decoding Unlocks Task-Oriented Behavior Without Parameter Updates
Abstract
With the rapid progress of large language models (LLMs), reliably evaluating the capabilities of pre-trained LLMs has become increasingly important. The challenge is that base pre-trained models are optimized for next-token prediction and often fail to follow instructions or produce well-formed answers under standard prompting and direct decoding. As a result, benchmark performance can conflate model capability with decoding-induced failures to produce task-oriented outputs, while exposing such behavior often relies on costly post-training. Recent decodingonly approaches attempt to reshape output distributions, but such methods can be inefficient and brittle across open-ended tasks. To address these limitations, we propose Energy-Based Decoding (EBD), a training-free, reward-guided framework for activating task-oriented behaviors from frozen pre-trained LLMs across both open-ended and objective tasks. EBD augments decoding with an external lightweight reward model, steering generations toward high-utility responses while anchoring them to the pre-trained model prior through a reward-tilted target distribution. We show that EBD shifts base-model outputs toward more instructionfollowing behavior, increasing behavioral similarity to post-trained counterparts and enabling a fairer inference-time evaluation of accessible pre-trained-model behavior. Empirically, EBD outperforms baselines across five models and six benchmarks, improving Qwen3-8B-Base on AlpacaEval2.0 from 8.8 to 44.5, reducing Mistral-7B Math500 latency by 18.9x relative to prior decoding work, and remaining robust to reward-model size.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2605.28020,
title = {The Missing Piece in Pre-trained Model Evaluation: Reward-Guided Decoding Unlocks Task-Oriented Behavior Without Parameter Updates},
author = {Shaobo Wang and Guo Chen and Ziyue Wang and Zhengyang Tang and Qingyang Liu and Xingzhang Ren and Dayiheng Liu and Linfeng Zhang},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.28020},
year = {2026}
}
Comments
26 pages, 5 figures, 8 tables