English

The Milky Way Project MOBStIRS: Parametrizing Infrared Stellar-Wind Bow Shock Morphologies with Citizen Science

Astrophysics of Galaxies 2025-04-15 v1 Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

Abstract

Mass-loss influences stellar evolution, especially for massive stars with strong winds. Stellar wind bow shock nebulae driven by Galactic OB stars can be used to measure mass-loss rates (M˙\dot{M}). The standoff distance (R0R_{0}) between the star and the bow shock is set by momentum flux balance between the stellar wind and the surrounding interstellar medium (ISM). We created the Milky Way Project: MOBStIRS (Mass-loss rates for OB Stars driving IR bow Shocks) using the online Zooniverse citizen science platform. We enlisted several hundred students to measure R0R_0 and two other projected shape parameters for 764 cataloged IR bow shocks. MOBStIRS incorporated 1528 JPEG cutout images produced from Spitzer GLIMPSE and MIPSGAL survey data. Measurements were aggregated to compute shape parameters for each bow shock image deemed high-quality by participants. The average statistical uncertainty on R0R_0 is 12.5%12.5\% but varies from <5%{<}5\% to 40%{\sim}40\% among individual bow shocks, contributing significantly to the total error budget of M˙\dot{M}. The derived nebular morphologies agree well with (magneto)hydrodynamic simulations of bow shocks driven by the winds of OB stars moving at Va=1040 km s1V_a = 10-40~km~s^{-1} with respect to the ambient interstellar medium (ISM). A systematic correction to R0R_0 to account for viewing angle appears unnecessary for computing M˙\dot{M}. Slightly more than half of MOBStIRS bow shocks are asymmetric, which could indicate anisotropic stellar winds, ISM clumping on sub-pc scales, time-dependent instabilities, and/or misalignments between the local ISM magnetic field and the star-bow shock axis.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2504.09898,
  title  = {The Milky Way Project MOBStIRS: Parametrizing Infrared Stellar-Wind Bow Shock Morphologies with Citizen Science},
  author = {Angelica S. Whisnant and Matthew S. Povich and Nikhil Patten and Henry A. Kobulnicky},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.09898},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

15 pages, 7 figures