English

The Malignant Tail: Spectral Segregation of Label Noise in Over-Parameterized Networks

Machine Learning 2026-04-07 v2 Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

While implicit regularization facilitates benign overfitting in low-noise regimes, recent theoretical work predicts a sharp phase transition to harmful overfitting as the noise-to-signal ratio increases. We experimentally isolate the geometric mechanism of this transition: the Malignant Tail, a failure mode where networks functionally segregate signal and noise, reducing coherent semantic features into low-rank subspaces while pushing stochastic label noise into high-frequency orthogonal components, distinct from systematic or corruption-aligned noise. Through a Spectral Linear Probe of training dynamics, we demonstrate that Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) fails to suppress this noise, instead implicitly biasing it toward high-frequency orthogonal subspaces, effectively preserving signal-noise separability. We show that this geometric separation is distinct from simple variance reduction in untrained models. In trained networks, SGD actively segregates noise, allowing post-hoc Explicit Spectral Truncation (d << D) to surgically prune the noise-dominated subspace. This approach recovers the optimal generalization capability latent in the converged model. Unlike unstable temporal early stopping, Geometric Truncation provides a stable post-hoc intervention. Our findings suggest that under label noise, excess spectral capacity is not harmless redundancy but a latent structural liability that allows for noise memorization, necessitating explicit rank constraints to filter stochastic corruptions for robust generalization.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2603.02293,
  title  = {The Malignant Tail: Spectral Segregation of Label Noise in Over-Parameterized Networks},
  author = {Zice Wang},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.02293},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

We have identified critical errors in citation accuracy and theoretical grounding that undermine the validity of the analysis and conclusions. To maintain academic integrity, we withdraw the paper to perform a full, thorough revision