English

The Josephson-Anderson Relation and the Classical D'Alembert Paradox

Fluid Dynamics 2021-09-15 v2 Quantum Gases Superconductivity

Abstract

Generalizing prior work of P. W. Anderson and E. R. Huggins, we show that a "detailed Josephson-Anderson relation" holds for drag on a finite body held at rest in a classical incompressible fluid flowing with velocity V.{\bf V}. The relation asserts an exact equality between the instantaneous power consumption by the drag, FV,-{\bf F}\cdot{\bf V}, and the vorticity flux across the potential mass current, (1/2)dJϵijkΣijdk.-(1/2)\int dJ\int \epsilon_{ijk}\Sigma_{ij}\,d\ell_k. Here Σij\Sigma_{ij} is the flux in the iith coordinate direction of the conserved jjth component of vorticity and the line-integrals over \ell are taken along streamlines of the potential flow solution uϕ=ϕ{\bf u}_\phi=\nabla\phi of the ideal Euler equation, carrying mass flux dJ=ρuϕdA.dJ=\rho\,{\bf u}_\phi\cdot d{\bf A}. The results generalize the theories of M. J. Lighthill for flow past a body and, in particular, the steady-state relation (1/2)ϵijkΣjk=ih,(1/2)\epsilon_{ijk}\langle\Sigma_{jk}\rangle =\partial_i\langle h\rangle, where h=p+(1/2)u2h=p+(1/2)|{\bf u}|^2 is the generalized enthalpy or total pressure, extends Lighthill's theory of vorticity generation at solid walls into the interior of the flow. We use these results to explain drag on the body in terms of vortex dynamics, unifying the theories for classical fluids and for quantum superfluids. The results offer a new solution to the "D'Alembert paradox" at infinite Reynolds numbers and imply the necessary conditions for turbulent drag reduction.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2103.15177,
  title  = {The Josephson-Anderson Relation and the Classical D'Alembert Paradox},
  author = {Gregory L. Eyink},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.15177},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

18 pages, 5 figures. A few minor typos have been corrected