English

The Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma for Clustering and Subspace Approximation: From Coresets to Dimension Reduction

Data Structures and Algorithms 2023-07-11 v3

Abstract

We study the effect of Johnson-Lindenstrauss transforms in various projective clustering problems, generalizing recent results which only applied to center-based clustering [MMR19]. We ask the general question: for a Euclidean optimization problem and an accuracy parameter ϵ(0,1)\epsilon \in (0, 1), what is the smallest target dimension tNt \in \mathbb{N} such that a Johnson-Lindenstrauss transform Π ⁣:RdRt\Pi \colon \mathbb{R}^d \to \mathbb{R}^t preserves the cost of the optimal solution up to a (1+ϵ)(1+\epsilon)-factor. We give a new technique which uses coreset constructions to analyze the effect of the Johnson-Lindenstrauss transform. Our technique, in addition applying to center-based clustering, improves on (or is the first to address) other Euclidean optimization problems, including: \bullet For (k,z)(k,z)-subspace approximation: we show that t=O~(zk2/ϵ3)t = \tilde{O}(zk^2 / \epsilon^3) suffices, whereas the prior best bound, of O(k/ϵ2)O(k/\epsilon^2), only applied to the case z=2z = 2 [CEMMP15]. \bullet For (k,z)(k,z)-flat approximation: we show t=O~(zk2/ϵ3)t = \tilde{O}(zk^2/\epsilon^3) suffices, completely removing the dependence on nn from the prior bound O~(zk2logn/ϵ3)\tilde{O}(zk^2 \log n/\epsilon^3) of [KR15]. \bullet For (k,z)(k,z)-line approximation: we show t=O((kloglogn+z+log(1/ϵ))/ϵ3)t = O((k \log \log n + z + \log(1/\epsilon)) / \epsilon^3) suffices, and ours is the first to give any dimension reduction result.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2205.00371,
  title  = {The Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma for Clustering and Subspace Approximation: From Coresets to Dimension Reduction},
  author = {Moses Charikar and Erik Waingarten},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.00371},
  year   = {2023}
}