English

The HI Mass Function of Star-forming Galaxies at $z\approx1$

Astrophysics of Galaxies 2024-05-07 v2

Abstract

We present the first estimate, based on direct HI 21 cm observations, of the HI mass function (HIMF) of star-forming galaxies at z1z\approx1, obtained by combining our measurement of the scaling relation between HI mass (MHIM_{HI}) and B-band luminosity (MBM_B) of star-forming galaxies with literature estimates of the B-band luminosity function at z1z\approx1. We determined the MHIMBM_{HI}-M_B relation by using the GMRT-CATz1 survey of the DEEP2 fields to measure the average HI mass of blue galaxies at z=0.741.45z=0.74-1.45 in three separate MBM_B subsamples. This was done by separately stacking the HI 21 cm emission signals of the galaxies in each subsample to detect, at (3.5-4.4)σ\sigma significance, the average HI 21 cm emission of each subsample. We find that the MHIMBM_{HI}-M_B relation at z1z\approx1 is consistent with that at z0z\approx0. We combine our estimate of the MHIMBM_{HI}-M_B relation at z1z\approx1 with the B-band luminosity function at z1z\approx1 to determine the HIMF at z1z\approx1. We find that the number density of galaxies with MHI>1010MM_{HI}>10^{10} M_\odot (higher than the knee of the local HIMF) at z1z\approx1 is a factor of 45\approx4-5 higher than that at z0z\approx0, for a wide range of assumed scatters in the MHIMBM_{HI}-M_B relation. We rule out the hypothesis that the number density of galaxies with MHI>1010MM_{HI}>10^{10} M_\odot remains unchanged between z1z \approx 1 and z0z\approx0 at 99.7\gtrsim99.7\% confidence. This is the first statistically significant evidence for evolution in the HIMF of galaxies from the epoch of cosmic noon.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2404.06546,
  title  = {The HI Mass Function of Star-forming Galaxies at $z\approx1$},
  author = {Aditya Chowdhury and Nissim Kanekar and Jayaram N. Chengalur},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.06546},
  year   = {2024}
}

Comments

9 pages, 5 figures; minor changes to match version in press at ApJ Letters