English

The $H_0$ tension: $\Delta G_N$ vs. $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2020-11-25 v2 High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

Abstract

We investigate whether the 4.4σ4.4\sigma tension on H0H_0 between SH0_{0}ES 2019 and Planck 2018 can be alleviated by a variation of Newton's constant GNG_N between the early and the late Universe. This changes the Hubble rate before recombination, similarly to adding ΔNeff\Delta N_{\rm eff} extra relativistic degrees of freedom. We implement a varying GNG_N in a scalar-tensor theory of gravity, with a non-minimal coupling (M2+βϕ2)R(M^2+\beta \phi^2)R. If the scalar ϕ\phi starts in the radiation era at an initial value ϕI0.5 Mp\phi_I \sim 0.5~M_p and with β<0\beta<0, a dynamical transition occurs naturally around the epoch of matter-radiation equality and the field evolves towards zero at late times. As a consequence, the H0H_0 tension between SH0_{0}ES (2019) and Planck 2018+BAO slightly decreases, as in ΔNeff\Delta N_{\rm eff} models, to the 3.8σ\sigma level. We then perform a fit to a combined Planck, BAO and supernovae (SH0_0ES and Pantheon) dataset. When including local constraints on Post-Newtonian (PN) parameters, we find H0=69.080.71+0.6 km/s/MpcH_0=69.08_{-0.71}^{+0.6}~\text{km/s/Mpc} and a marginal improvement of Δχ23.2\Delta\chi^2\simeq-3.2 compared to Λ\LambdaCDM, at the cost of 2 extra parameters. In order to take into account scenarios where local constraints could be evaded, we also perform a fit without PN constraints and find H0=69.650.78+0.8 km/s/MpcH_0=69.65_{-0.78}^{+0.8}~\text{km/s/Mpc} and a more significant improvement Δχ2=5.4\Delta\chi^2=-5.4 with 2 extra parameters. For comparison, we find that the ΔNeff\Delta N_{\rm eff} model gives H0=70.080.95+0.91 km/s/MpcH_0=70.08_{-0.95}^{+0.91}~\text{km/s/Mpc} and Δχ2=3.4\Delta\chi^2=-3.4 at the cost of one extra parameter, which disfavors the Λ\LambdaCDM limit just above 2σ\sigma, since ΔNeff=0.340.16+0.15\Delta N_{\rm eff}=0.34_{-0.16}^{+0.15}. Overall, our varying GNG_N model performs similarly to the ΔNeff\Delta N_{\rm eff} model in respect to the H0H_0 tension, if a physical mechanism to remove PN constraints can be implemented.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2004.05049,
  title  = {The $H_0$ tension: $\Delta G_N$ vs. $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$},
  author = {Guillermo Ballesteros and Alessio Notari and Fabrizio Rompineve},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.05049},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

20 pages, 7 figures. v2: Pantheon dataset added, additional new results for model without PN constraints, additional short discussion of S8. Version accepted for publication in JCAP