The Google Scholar Experiment: how to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators
Abstract
Google Scholar has been well received by the research community. Its promises of free, universal and easy access to scientific literature as well as the perception that it covers better than other traditional multidisciplinary databases the areas of the Social Sciences and the Humanities have contributed to the quick expansion of Google Scholar Citations and Google Scholar Metrics: two new bibliometric products that offer citation data at the individual level and at journal level. In this paper we show the results of a experiment undertaken to analyze Google Scholar's capacity to detect citation counting manipulation. For this, six documents were uploaded to an institutional web domain authored by a false researcher and referencing all the publications of the members of the EC3 research group at the University of Granada. The detection of Google Scholar of these papers outburst the citations included in the Google Scholar Citations profiles of the authors. We discuss the effects of such outburst and how it could affect the future development of such products not only at individual level but also at journal level, especially if Google Scholar persists with its lack of transparency.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.1309.2413,
title = {The Google Scholar Experiment: how to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators},
author = {Emilio Delgado López-Cózar and Nicolás Robinson-Garcia and Daniel Torres-Salinas},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1309.2413},
year = {2017}
}
Comments
This paper has been accepted for publication in the Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. It is based on a previous working paper available at arXiv:1212.0638.pdf. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1212.0638