English

The Goldilocks zone of governing technology: Leveraging uncertainty for responsible quantum practices

Computers and Society 2025-07-18 v1

Abstract

Emerging technologies challenge conventional governance approaches, especially when uncertainty is not a temporary obstacle but a foundational feature as in quantum computing. This paper reframes uncertainty from a governance liability to a generative force, using the paradigms of quantum mechanics to propose adaptive, probabilistic frameworks for responsible innovation. We identify three interdependent layers of uncertainty--physical, technical, and societal--central to the evolution of quantum technologies. The proposed Quantum Risk Simulator (QRS) serves as a conceptual example, an imaginative blueprint rather than a prescriptive tool, meant to illustrate how probabilistic reasoning could guide dynamic, uncertainty-based governance. By foregrounding epistemic and ontological ambiguity, and drawing analogies from cognitive neuroscience and predictive processing, we suggest a new model of governance aligned with the probabilistic essence of quantum systems. This model, we argue, is especially promising for the European Union as a third way between laissez-faire innovation and state-led control, offering a flexible yet responsible pathway for regulating quantum and other frontier technologies.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2507.12957,
  title  = {The Goldilocks zone of governing technology: Leveraging uncertainty for responsible quantum practices},
  author = {Miriam Meckel and Philipp Hacker and Lea Steinacker and Aurelija Lukoseviciene and Surjo R. Soekadar and Jacob Slosser and Gina-Maria Poehlmann},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.12957},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

Paper is accepted and will be published