The galaxy-halo size relation of low-mass galaxies in FIRE
Abstract
Galaxy sizes correlate closely with the sizes of their parent dark matter haloes, suggesting a link between halo formation and galaxy growth. However, the precise nature of this relation and its scatter remains to be understood fully, especially for low-mass galaxies. We analyse the galaxy-halo size relation for low-mass () central galaxies over the past 12.5 billion years with the help of cosmological volume simulations (FIREbox) from the Feedback in Realistic Environments (FIRE) project. We find a nearly linear relationship between the half-stellar mass galaxy size and the parent dark matter halo virial radius . This relation evolves only weakly since redshift : , with a nearly constant scatter . Whilst this ratio is similar to what is expected from models where galaxy disc sizes are set by halo angular momentum, the low-mass galaxies in our sample are not angular momentum supported, with stellar rotational to circular velocity ratios . Introducing redshift as another parameter to the GHSR does not decrease the scatter. Furthermore, this scatter does not correlate with any of the halo properties we investigate -- including spin and concentration -- suggesting that baryonic processes and feedback physics are instead critical in setting the scatter in the galaxy-halo size relation. Given the relatively small scatter and the weak dependence of the galaxy-halo size relation on redshift and halo properties for these low-mass central galaxies, we propose using galaxy sizes as an independent method from stellar masses to infer halo masses.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2112.05159,
title = {The galaxy-halo size relation of low-mass galaxies in FIRE},
author = {Eric Rohr and Robert Feldmann and James Bullock and Onur Çatmabacak and Michael Boylan-Kolchin and Claude-André Faucher-Giguère and Dušan Kereš and Lichen Liang and Jorge Moreno and Andrew Wetzel},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.05159},
year = {2024}
}
Comments
14 pages, 9 figures, 3 tables + 3 appendices (5 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables). Accepted for publication in MNRAS. Reuploaded after proofing stage