The Fine-Grained and Parallel Complexity of Andersen's Pointer Analysis

Pointer analysis is one of the fundamental problems in static program analysis. Given a set of pointers, the task is to produce a useful over-approximation of the memory locations that each pointer may point-to at runtime. The most common formulation is Andersen's Pointer Analysis (APA), defined as an inclusion-based set of $m$ pointer constraints over a set of $n$ pointers. Existing algorithms solve APA in $O(n^2\cdot m)$ time, while it has been conjectured that the problem has no truly sub-cubic algorithm, with a proof so far having remained elusive. In this work we draw a rich fine-grained and parallel complexity landscape of APA, and present upper and lower bounds. First, we establish an $O(n^3)$ upper-bound for general APA, improving over $O(n^2\cdot m)$ as $n=O(m)$. Second, we show that even on-demand APA ("may a specific pointer $a$ point to a specific location $b$?") has an $\Omega(n^3)$ (combinatorial) lower bound under standard complexity-theoretic hypotheses. This formally establishes the long-conjectured "cubic bottleneck" of APA, and shows that our $O(n^3)$-time algorithm is optimal. Third, we show that under mild restrictions, APA is solvable in $\tilde{O}(n^{\omega})$ time, where $\omega<2.373$ is the matrix-multiplication exponent. It is believed that $\omega=2+o(1)$, in which case this bound becomes quadratic. Fourth, we show that even under such restrictions, even the on-demand problem has an $\Omega(n^2)$ lower bound under standard complexity-theoretic hypotheses, and hence our algorithm is optimal when $\omega=2+o(1)$. Fifth, we study the parallelizability of APA and establish lower and upper bounds: (i) in general, the problem is P-complete and hence unlikely parallelizable, whereas (ii) under mild restrictions, the problem is parallelizable. Our theoretical treatment formalizes several insights that can lead to practical improvements in the future.