English

The Fefferman-Phong uncertainty principle for representations of Lie groups and applications

Classical Analysis and ODEs 2024-03-05 v2 Mathematical Physics Functional Analysis math.MP

Abstract

We prove a new uncertainty principle for square-integrable irreducible unitary representations of connected Lie groups. The concentration of the matrix coefficients is measured in terms of weighted LpL^p norms, with weights in the local Muckenhoupt class A,locA_{\infty,{\rm loc}} associated with a subRiemannian left-invariant metric and a relatively invariant measure. The result is reminiscent of the Fefferman-Phong uncertainty principle, and is new even for the Schr\"odinger representation of the reduced Heisenberg group, which corresponds to the short-time Fourier transform. As an application, we give an optimal estimate of the order of magnitude of the bottom of the spectrum and of the essential spectrum of semiclassical anti-Wick operators in Rd\mathbb{R}^d with a nonnegative symbol aa in the class AA_{\infty} (in particular, for polynomial symbols). Precisely, we show that the infimum inf(x0,ω0)R2d ⁣ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣B((x0,ω0),h)a(x,ω)dxdω\inf _{(x_0,\omega_0)\in{\mathbb{R}^{2d}}} -\!\!\!\!\!\int_{B((x_0,\omega_0),\sqrt{h})} a(x,\omega)\, dx\,d\omega represents (up to multiplicative constants) both a lower bound and an upper bound for the bottom of the spectrum, uniformly with respect to h>0h>0. Similarly the quantity lim inf(x0,ω0) ⁣ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣B((x0,ω0),h)a(x,ω)dxdω\liminf_{(x_0,\omega_0)\to\infty} -\!\!\!\!\!\!\int_{B((x_0,\omega_0),\sqrt{h})} a(x,\omega)\, dx\,d\omega represents both a lower bound and an upper bound for the bottom of the essential spectrum, uniformly with respect to h>0h>0. Similar results are proved for semiclassical symbol classes.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2402.03250,
  title  = {The Fefferman-Phong uncertainty principle for representations of Lie groups and applications},
  author = {Fabio Nicola},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03250},
  year   = {2024}
}

Comments

31 pages. Added some references, Remarks 4.4 and 4.5 and the whole Section 6, devoted to similar results for semiclassical symbol classes